Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer
Inicio / Trump Is Again Considering Invoking Emergency Powers to Build Border Wall

Trump Is Again Considering Invoking Emergency Powers to Build Border Wall

Publicar un comentario

National Emergency alleged by Donald Trump

The National Emergency Concerning the Southern Edge of the U.s.a. (Annunciation 9844) was declared on Feb 15, 2019, by President of the United States Donald Trump. Citing the National Emergencies Human action, information technology ordered the diversion of billions of dollars of funds that had been appropriated to the U.South. Department of Defense force for military construction.[1] [2] Trump declared the emergency after he signed, but derided, a bipartisan funding nib (passed by the House and the Senate a day before) containing border security funding without funding for the edge wall that Trump demanded.[2] [3]

Trump had previously threatened to declare a national emergency if Congress did not pass his entire desired program for a wall on the United States–Mexican edge by Feb 15, 2019.[4] Under Proclamation 9844, the Trump assistants intended to redirect $viii billion in previously-agreed expenditure and to use the money to build the wall instead.[five] [vi] [7] Nether Trump'southward plan, $iii.vi billion assigned to military construction, $2.v billion meant for the Department of Defense's drug interdiction activities, and $600 million from the Treasury's forfeiture fund would exist diverted for wall construction.[5] [6] [7] Trump's declaration was unprecedented in that none of the 58 previous emergency declarations made by U.S. presidents involved circumventing Congress to spend money it had expressly refused to qualify or allocate.[8] [9]

Trump'due south declaration of a national emergency was condemned by Democrats every bit unconstitutional; U.S. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer called the proclamation an affront to the rule of constabulary that was "a lawless human action, a gross abuse of the power of the presidency and a desperate attempt to distract from the fact that President Trump bankrupt his core promise to accept United mexican states pay for his wall."[10] Some Republicans besides criticized Trump's declaration, fearing that circumventing Congress would set a unsafe precedent for the futurity.[10] Congress passed a joint resolution to terminate the national emergency, but it was vetoed past Trump; this was his first veto.[eleven]

Trump'due south annunciation of a national emergency was immediately challenged in federal court, with California and sixteen other states suing the federal authorities on separation of powers grounds.[12]

The Sierra Club and ACLU brought a similar arrange.[thirteen] In 2019, a U.S. district court issued a preliminary injunction, and later a permanent injunction, in the Sierra Club suit, blocking Trump from diverting military funds for construction of a edge wall.[14] In July 2019, the Supreme Court, in a 5–4, i-paragraph ruling, overturned the lower court's ruling in Trump v. Sierra Social club that blocked the use of funds to construct the edge wall pending further legal proceedings; the Supreme Courtroom majority found that the Sierra Club likely lacked legal standing.[xv] [16]

In October 2019, in a dissever case, a U.S. district court in Texas constitute that the El Paso County, Texas and the Edge Network for Human Rights had legal standing to challenge Trump's attempt to divert $3.6 billion in military machine structure for wall construction along the Mexico edge, and in Dec 2019, the court issued a permanent injunction blocking the attempted diversion of funds.[17] The ruling did not bear upon the use of other funds that the Trump administration designed for wall construction, such as counter-drug and Treasury Forfeiture Funds.[17]

In a proclamation made on February 13, 2020, Trump extended Proclamation 9844 for an additional year; he repeated the one-year extension on January 18, 2021, but ii days earlier leaving office.[18] [19] However, Trump's successor, President Joe Biden, in i of his first official acts as president on January xx, 2021, terminated Trump's emergency declaration and paused piece of work on the wall.[19] [20] On Feb 11, 2021, Biden wrote in a letter to Congress that the original annunciation of national emergency had been "unwarranted" and that no more government funds would exist used to build the wall.[21]

Background [edit]

Trump campaign and presidency [edit]

The Wall Street Periodical reported the twenty-four hour period of Trump's declaration that his activity was the effect of "ii years of political neglect of his signature campaign promise, lost amidst competing priorities and divisions within his administration," with no single administration official having been designated to champion funding of the border wall in Congress. Trump rejected a proposal in January 2018 that would have authorized $25 billion for wall structure in exchange for a path to citizenship for Dreamers, as well every bit a similar proposal the adjacent month. In March, Congress approved a bill providing for $ane.6 billion in barrier funding. Threatening to veto the bill, The Journal reported that Trump was surprised to acquire that the $ane.6 billion was the amount that had been requested in his budget. Trump's budget manager Mick Mulvaney and so privately advised the president to blame House speaker Paul Ryan for non seeking more than funding. Tom Davis, an influential former Republican congressman, observed, "The mistake they made was non coming in right abroad and coming up with a programme. You lot wonder why they didn't try to jam this through when Republicans controlled the Firm because it'south a lot more complicated at present trying to convince Nancy Pelosi."[22]

2018–2019 government shutdown [edit]

Before Trump declared the national emergency, the United States had experienced a federal government shutdown, which ran from midnight EST on Dec 22, 2018, until January 25, 2019 (35 days). It was the longest U.South. government shutdown in history.[23] [24] [25] It occurred when the United States Congress and President could not agree on an appropriations neb to fund the operations of the federal government for the 2019 financial yr. The shutdown affected about ane-fourth of government activities. It caused around 800,000 employees and 1 one thousand thousand federal contractors to be furloughed or obligated to work without pay.[26] The shutdown was estimated by the Congressional Budget Office to toll the United states economy at least $11 billion.[27] [Notes i]

The President had demanded that the appropriations beak include for $five.seven billion in federal funds for a proposed U.S.–Mexico border wall.[28] [29] [30] In December 2018, the Republican-controlled Senate unanimously passed an appropriations bill without wall funding.[31] However, Trump refused to back up the bill, and it was therefore not considered by the Republican-controlled Firm.[32]

By mid-January 2019, American opposition to the shutdown had become widespread.[33] That month, representatives elected in Nov 2018 took part. The newly Democrat-controlled House approved the appropriations pecker that had earlier passed the Senate unanimously. Trump said he would nonetheless veto any bill that did non fund an entire edge wall. Republican Senate Bulk Leader Mitch McConnell blocked the Senate from because appropriations legislation that Trump would veto, including the beak that the Senate had earlier passed. Democrats and some Republicans passed multiple bills attempting to reopen the government.

On Jan 25, 2019, Trump agreed to endorse a stopgap bill to reopen the authorities until February xv. All the same, he reiterated his demand for the border wall funding and said he would shut down the government again or declare a national emergency and use military machine funding to build the wall if Congress did not appropriate the funds by February 15.

On Feb xiv, the House and Senate passed an appropriations bill funding the government until September 30, the end of the fiscal year 2019. Trump signed the beak into law the post-obit 24-hour interval. The beak includes United states of america$1.375 billion to construct new fencing on 55 miles of the Mexico–United states of america border.

Annunciation [edit]

President Trump signed a declaration of national emergency on February xv, 2019.

On February 15, 2019, President Trump spoke to the media in the White Firm Rose Garden. Later signing the spending neb to keep the government open up, Trump declared a national emergency over the border crisis, hoping to go admission to $8 billion to use for border security.[34] [4] During his annunciation, Trump stated, "I could do the wall over a longer menstruation of time. I didn't demand to do this, but I'd rather do information technology much faster." Critics asserted this statement would undercut the rationale for his emergency declaration in court challenges.[35] [36] [37] [38]

Funding [edit]

To obtain $8 billion for border wall construction, the Trump assistants proposed augmenting the earlier Feb xiv $1.375 billion appropriations nib by diverting other previously-allocated monies: $iii.6 billion for armed services construction, $2.5 billion for the Department of Defense's counter-drug activities, and $600 million from Treasury's drug-asset forfeiture funds.[39] [xl] White House officials said that the national emergency specifically enabled the $3.6 billion war machine diversion while the $ii.five billion from Defense and the $600 million from Treasury were possible due to "presidential discretion".[ citation needed ]

This was the starting time time since the September 11 attacks in 2001 that an emergency annunciation authorized military action.[41]

Gyre Call reported on Feb 21, 2019, that over 1-tertiary of the funds the Trump administration had identified for diversion had already been spent by the Department of Defense.[42] [43] In March 2019 the Pentagon issued a list of proposed armed services construction projects which could be postponed, nether the president's emergency announcement, so that their funding could be diverted to build the wall.[44] The Pentagon authorized up to $1 billion to be transferred to the Army Corps of Engineers for construction of additional barriers.[45]

Legislative activeness to overturn and presidential veto [edit]

Nether the national emergency legislation, Congress can overturn a annunciation of emergency legislatively. If the House passes a privileged resolution to overturn, the Senate is required to take upwardly the resolution inside eighteen days. If the Senate passes the resolution, by a simple bulk vote, the bill goes to the president, who has the choice of vetoing information technology. Congress can override the veto by a two-thirds vote in both houses.[46]

House speaker Nancy Pelosi announced on February 20, 2019, that Democrats would introduce such a resolution in two days.[47] The measure, House Articulation Resolution 46, stated: "Resolved by the Senate and Firm of Representatives of the Us of America in Congress assembled, That, pursuant to section 202 of the National Emergencies Act (50 U.s.C. 1622), the national emergency declared by the finding of the President on February 15, 2019, in Proclamation 9844 (84 Fed. Reg. 4949) is hereby terminated."[48]

The Business firm voted to approve the bill on February 27 by a vote of 245–182, with thirteen Republicans voting in favor.[49] On March 3, Rand Paul became the fourth Republican senator to declare he would vote for the resolution, improving the chances of passage.[50] The adjacent day he asserted that "at least" ten other Republican senators told him they would likewise vote for the resolution.[51] On March fourteen, the Senate voted 59–41 to support the bill to overturn Trump's emergency declaration, with twelve Republicans voting in favor.[52] [53] [54]

On March 15, 2019, Trump vetoed the Joint Resolution, calling information technology "reckless" at a signing ceremony where he signed the veto statement, flanked past members of the Cabinet and police force enforcement officials.[11] [55] [56] Pelosi responded past scheduling a vote to override the veto on March 26, 2019.[57] There were 248 votes to override the president'southward veto, and 181 votes against, which fell short of the ⅔ supermajority (286 votes) needed to override.[58] [59]

A second attempt to overturn the emergency failed in October 2019, when the Senate failed to override a Presidential veto past a vote of 53–36.[lx]

Legal challenges and injunctions [edit]

16 U.Due south. states (shown) jointly filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration iii days after the emergency annunciation.

In his statement declaring the emergency, President Trump acknowledged the inevitability of legal challenges, stating that he anticipated losing in lower courts, but ultimately prevailing in the Supreme Court.[61] The lawsuits are expected to revolve around different issues such as property rights, tribal sovereignty, and the limits of the presidency. Similar courtroom cases challenging the Secure Fence Act of 2006 still remain open over a decade later.[62]

As of February 22, 2019[update], at least 6 separate lawsuits take been filed. Three lawsuits were filed within days of the declaration of the declaration: El Paso County, Texas filed a lawsuit[63] in the Western District of Texas in concert with the Border Network for Human Rights, Protect Commonwealth, and the Niskanen Center;[62] [64] [65] [66] Public Citizen sued on behalf of the Frontera Audubon Guild and three Texan landowners;[67] [66] and the Citizens for Responsibleness and Ethics in Washington filed a lawsuit against the Department of Justice in a case involving a FOIA request.[66]

Suits by Sierra Club and 16 states [edit]

Two separate lawsuits were filed in the The states District Court for the Northern District of California shortly afterwards the order was signed. The starting time, filed on February 18, 2019, was from xvi U.S. states led by California[Notes 2] challenging the declaration. The lawsuit asserted that Trump'south executive club diverting funds appropriated by Congress from the Section of Defence force to the other agencies responsible for the wall's construction violated the Appropriations Clause of Article 1 of the United States Constitution, limiting this equally a Congressional power.[68] [69] [70] On December 11, 2019, Judge Haywood Gilliam Jr. ruled that the executive order allocating the US$6.7 billion in funds violated the Appropriations Clause, stating that the executive order attempted to obtain the funds for the same project just labeled under a Defence projection that Trump had been unable to obtain from Congress when it was a civilian project nether the Department of Homeland Security.[71]

The second suit was filed on February 19, 2018, by the ACLU on behalf of the Sierra Society, the Southern Border Communities Coalition, and other interested organizations and people.[72] [73] Approximate Gilliam, who besides heard this case, issued a temporary injunction on May 24, 2019, blocking the Trump administration'due south programme to divert funds not explicitly appropriated by Congress. Gilliam wrote that "Congress's 'absolute' control over federal expenditures—even when that control may frustrate the desires of the Executive Branch regarding initiatives information technology views as important—is non a bug in our constitutional system. It is a feature of that system, and an essential one."[74] In June 2019, this injunction was converted into a permanent injunction.[14] In July 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the injunction.[75] On July 26, 2019, the Supreme Court issued a stay to Gilliam'due south ruling, allowing wall construction to go on while litigation continues.[76] [15] [77]

In June 2020, the Ninth Circuit affirmed Gilliam's ruling in both the states' and the Sierra Club's cases, ruling that the reappropriation of funds was unlawful.[78] [79] Trump petitioned the ruling to the Supreme Courtroom, which had certified the case to hear during the 2020–21 term,[eighty] though separately refused to lift the stay on the permanent injunction towards ongoing construction despite the Ninth'south ruling.[81]

Suit past El Paso County and Border Network for Human Rights [edit]

In October 2019, in a divide example, U.S. Commune Judge David Briones of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Texas establish that the El Paso County, Texas and the Border Network for Man Rights had legal continuing to challenge Trump's attempt to divert $iii.vi billion in military structure for wall construction along the Mexico border, and in December 2019, the court issued a permanent injunction blocking the attempted diversion of funds.[17] The ruling did not effect the use of other funds that the Trump administration designed for wall structure, such as counter-drug and Treasury Forfeiture Funds.[17]

In January 2020, a panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, in a 2–1 conclusion, issued a temporary stay of the injunction pending further appellate proceedings. The panel split along ideological lines: the 2 Republican-appointed judges (Edith Jones and Andrew A. Oldham) voted to event the temporary stay, while the panel's only Democratic appointee, Stephen A. Higginson, dissented.[82]

Other actions [edit]

In June 2019, U.S. District Judge Trevor N. McFadden denied a request by the U.S. House of Representatives to temporarily block spending on the wall. The Business firm claimed in its lawsuit that the Trump administration was overstepping its authority, and sought to foreclose it from spending over a billion dollars information technology had already transferred from armed services pay and pension accounts, and more funds from an emergency military construction fund that had not yet been transferred. McFadden, a Trump appointee, said the House had no legal continuing to sue the president and that therefore the Court lacked jurisdiction to hear the merits.[83] McFadden issued no opinion on the merits of the example, saying "The Court declines to take sides in this fight between the House and the President."[84]

In Feb 2019, the Center for Biological Diversity, Defenders of Wild fauna, and the Animal Legal Defense Fund filed a lawsuit in Washington D.C.[85] [86]

The Tohono O'odham Nation has raised the issue with the Organization of American States' Inter-American Commission on Man Rights, and the Cocopah, Kickapoo, and Kumeyaay are also considering their legal options.[62]

Reactions [edit]

Some analysts stated that if legally upheld, the declaration would vastly expand governmental power, especially that of the presidency and the executive branch.[four] [87] [88] [89] Reporter Charlie Savage summarized the political touch of the declaration, saying that "no matter what else happens, Mr. Trump's willingness to invoke emergency powers to circumvent Congress is likely to go down as an boggling violation of constitutional norms—setting a precedent that future presidents of both parties may emulate to unilaterally achieve their ain policy goals."[4]

A number of legal scholars[90] [91] called the announcement an "abuse" and a "deliberate misapplication" of the National Emergencies Deed,[89] [92] [93] with many stating that the declaration threatened the separation of powers in the U.s.a.[4] [87] [89] [94] [95] and amounted to a potential constitutional crisis.[94] [96] [97] [98] [99] [100] They said the declaration was a continuation of the expansion of presidential power observed during the 2010s in the U.s..[101] [102] [103]

Thousands reportedly participated in a nationwide Presidents 24-hour interval protest on February 18, 2019, to denounce the emergency announcement.[104] [105] [106]

On February 25, a bipartisan grouping of 58 former senior national security officials and 25 former Republican lawmakers implored Congress to overturn Trump'southward emergency declaration. The one-time lawmakers wrote, "It has always been a Republican key principle that no thing how strong our policy preferences, no matter how deep our loyalties to presidents or party leaders, in order to remain a constitutional republic we must act within the borders of the Constitution," while the security officials contended that there is no "documented terrorist or national security emergency at the southern border" nor an "emergency related to tearing criminal offence."[107]

Congress [edit]

Republicans [edit]

Support from Republicans has been divided, with most conservative House Republicans embracing Trump'south action, while opposition was more pronounced among Senate Republicans. Reportedly, considering of Trump's high approval ratings amid Republicans, many in the party were concerned that expressing public opposition to the president's activity could effect in their political demise.[108] [109] An assay by FiveThirtyEight found that through February 18, 2019, 34% of the 53 Republican Senators had expressed support for the annunciation.[46]

Before the declaration, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell—long a defender of Senate prerogatives—and most other Senate Republicans strongly urged the president to not take the activeness. Afterward the declaration, McConnell led several other senators in pivoting to support it.[108] Senator Lindsey Graham expressed emphatic support for the declaration.[110] Georgia Senator Johnny Isakson said he "back up[s] the president in his decision,"[111] and Richard Shelby said Trump has "the power to defend the country, to defend the borders."[110] Senator John Hoeven stated that Republicans "back up the president'due south efforts to strengthen border security," and Senator Kevin Cramer said that Trump "will address the crisis at the southern border, whether or not Congress does."[112] Representative Matt Gaetz stated that he was "proud" of Trump.[110]

Others, including Senators Rand Paul, Chuck Grassley, and Marco Rubio, spoke out strongly against the annunciation.[113] Susan Collins said the president is "usurping congressional dominance" while Lamar Alexander said the United States' "founders chose not to create a main executive with the power to taxation the people and spend their money whatsoever way he chooses."[110] Representative Justin Amash stated that Trump is "attempting to circumvent our ramble arrangement".[114]

Will Hurd, the merely Republican representative for a district along the southern border, said that the national emergency declaration "is non a tool that the president needs in club to solve this problem," and argued that a coherent strategy with increased manpower and engineering at the border would be the solution.[115] [116]

Democrats [edit]

Shortly before the emergency was alleged, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi warned Republicans that this would gear up a precedent for the side by side Democratic president to declare a national emergency on gun violence.[117] After the declaration, Pelosi and Senate Minority Leader Senator Chuck Schumer issued a joint statement opposing the declaration.[118] Pelosi and Schumer described the announcement equally an affront to the rule of law, "a lawless act, a gross abuse of the power of the presidency and a desperate try to distract from the fact that President Trump broke his core promise to take Mexico pay for his wall."[10] The Democratic leaders' statement said that Trump was trying to "shred the Constitution" and vowed to seek "every remedy bachelor" to cake information technology.[119] [120]

Senator Angus Male monarch, who caucuses with the Democrats, called the motion "antonymous to our American system of government."[121] Senator Tina Smith, a member of the Minnesota Democratic–Farmer–Labor Party, said the announcement was an "attempt at a power take hold of."[112]

The House Judiciary Committee announced an "immediate investigation", summoning Department of Justice officials and White House Counsel Pat Cipollone to congressional hearings and requesting various documents from the White Business firm.[122]

[edit]

A number of media commentators considered the proclamation a threat to the "integrity" of American democracy.[123] [124]

Many prominent Republican and conservative commentators expressed concerns that the declaration violated the separation of powers and the powers of Congress. Noted neoconservative and long time Trump-critic Max Boot argued in the Washington Mail that the action was Trump's "latest set on on the norms of American democracy" and that "arguably nothing Trump has done to date has been as alarming as his misuse of the 1976 National Emergencies Act."[125] and would set up a precedent to permit a time to come Democratic president to declare an emergency taking unilateral action on gun control and climate change.[126]

Ann Coulter, an early Trump supporter and now frequent critic of the president sharply criticized the move, stating "the goal of a national emergency is for Trump to scam the stupidest people in his base of operations for 2 more than years" and that "[t]he only national emergency is that our president is an idiot."[127] [128]

Noting that there volition be legal challenges to the activeness, many commentators as well predicted that Trump'due south own comments during his announcement will get in harder to support his merits that in that location is an bodily emergency.[129] However, conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt said he thought the president had a "adept shot at winning" in the Supreme Court.[130]

Academics [edit]

Some legal scholars considered the declaration of a national emergency equally an case of executive overreach and an abuse of the National Emergencies Human activity,[92] arguing that the declaration would permanently and vastly aggrandize the power of the presidency and the executive branch.[4] [91] [ninety] [131]

Andrew Boyle of the Brennan Center for Justice'due south Liberty & National Security Program said that the National Emergencies Human activity was broadly worded, providing much flexibility to the executive in many areas, including "control over the military and structure projects."[132] Boyle predicted that lawsuits challenging an emergency announcement would focus on bug such as whether edifice the wall was of "military necessity."[132] Boyle stated that historically, presidents had abused states of emergency "with the tacit consent of the legislature."[132] Boyle suggested that since Trump "has a history of blowing through norms that other executives take adhered to" Congress might begin to revisit its historical supposition that the executive was acting in skillful faith.[132]

Presidential historian Douglas Brinkley said of the declaration: "It shrinks the importance of Congress even more. It is a wild-eyed majestic presidency."[133]

Catholic Church [edit]

In February 2019, Congress amended an existing appropriations beak to protect several sites along the border, including the historic La Lomita Chapel in Mission, Texas.[134] [135] Trump's declaration of a national emergency could have removed those protections.[136] The local pastor, Roy Snipes, and his bishop, Daniel E. Flores, opposed the plan to use church property for the wall, and the Brownsville diocese has challenged information technology in court.[137] The Georgetown Academy Constabulary Center's Institute for Ramble Advocacy and Protection (ICAP) filed a brief in support of the diocese.[138] In a prove of support for the chapel, over a one thousand parishioners held a procession on Palm Sunday, Apr fourteen, 2019, from Our Lady of Guadalupe Church to the chapel.[139]

Public opinion [edit]

A majority of Americans disapproved of Trump's emergency declaration. Three national surveys in February 2019 showed that between 51% and 61% of Americans opposed the declaration, with between 36% and 39% supporting it. These figures by and large reflected Trump's overall presidential approving ratings.[140] Support and opposition was highly polarized by party: in a Marist Poll, 94% of Democrats and 62% of independents, but simply 12% of Republicans, disapproved of Trump's proclamation of a national emergency to build a wall.[141]

See also [edit]

  • Clearing reform in the Us
  • List of national emergencies in the Us

Notes [edit]

  1. ^ Excluding indirect costs that were difficult to quantify.
  2. ^ California, Colorado, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Maine, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New United mexican states, New York, Oregon, and Virginia

References [edit]

  1. ^ 84 FR 4949
  2. ^ a b Sink, Justin; Talev, Margaret (Feb fifteen, 2019). "Trump Signs Spending Neb and Declares Emergency to Build Wall". Bloomberg L.P. Archived from the original on February sixteen, 2019. Retrieved February 15, 2019.
  3. ^ Thrush, Glenn (February 15, 2019). "In a Divided Washington, Congress Averted a Shutdown – but at a Price". The New York Times . Retrieved February 17, 2019.
  4. ^ a b c d e f Savage, Charlie (February 14, 2019). "Trump'southward Confront-Saving Way Out of Crisis Raises Fears Over Rule of Law". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on February xv, 2019. Retrieved February 15, 2019.
  5. ^ a b Talev, Margaret; Sink, Justin (February 14, 2019). "Trump Plans $8 Billion for Edge Wall Invoking His Own Authority". Bloomberg.com. Archived from the original on February 20, 2019. Retrieved February 21, 2019.
  6. ^ a b Sakuma, Amanda (Feb 17, 2019). "The interim Pentagon principal has yet to say whether Trump's border wall is militarily necessary". Voice.com. Archived from the original on February 21, 2019. Retrieved Feb 21, 2019.
  7. ^ a b "Trump looks to raid Pentagon budget for wall money using emergency powers". The Washington Post. February 15, 2019. Archived from the original on Feb 15, 2019.
  8. ^ Savage, Charlie (February xv, 2019). "Presidents Have Alleged Dozens of Emergencies, but None Similar Trump's". The New York Times. Archived from the original on Feb 17, 2019. Retrieved Feb 17, 2019.
  9. ^ Ballhaus, Rebecca (February 16, 2019). "Trump Declares Emergency Over Wall, Inviting Likely Court Fight". Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on February 16, 2019. Retrieved February 17, 2019.
  10. ^ a b c Dartunorro Clark, 'Dangerous.' 'Abuse.' 'Lawless': Bipartisan attack on Trump national emergency declaration Archived April 29, 2019, at the Wayback Auto, NBC News (February 14, 2019).
  11. ^ a b Tackett, Michael (March 15, 2019). "Trump Bug Start Veto After Congress Rejects Border Emergency". The New York Times. Archived from the original on March 15, 2019. Retrieved March xv, 2019.
  12. ^ Rebecca Davis O'Brien & Sadie Gurman, States File Accommodate Confronting Trump Administration Over Wall Emergency Archived June 21, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, Wall Street Journal (February 18, 2019).
  13. ^ Bobby Allyn, Federal Judge Rules Confronting Edge Wall Construction With Military Funds Archived July one, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, NPR (June 28, 2019).
  14. ^ a b Kartikay Mehrotra, Trump's Plan to Start Building Wall Monday Crumbles in Court Archived July 2, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, Bloomberg (June 29, 2019).
  15. ^ a b de Vogue, Ariane (July 26, 2019). "Supreme Court clears way for Trump admin to utilize Defense funds for edge wall structure". CNN. Archived from the original on July 26, 2019. Retrieved July 26, 2019.
  16. ^ Adam Liptak (July 26, 2019). "Supreme Courtroom Lets Trump Proceed on Border Wall". New York Times. Archived from the original on July 26, 2019. Retrieved July 26, 2019.
  17. ^ a b c d Priscilla Alvarez & Caroline Kelly, Federal approximate blocks utilise of billions of dollars in Pentagon funds to build edge wall Archived December fourteen, 2019, at the Wayback Car, CNN (December x, 2019).
  18. ^ Elis, Niv (February 13, 2020). "Trump extends emergency declaration at border". The Loma. Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved February fifteen, 2021.
  19. ^ a b Sandra Sanchez, Biden rescinds Trump's emergency announcement on border security, halts border wall construction Archived February 15, 2021, at the Wayback Machine, Border Report (Jan 20, 2021).
  20. ^ Biden, Joe (January 12, 2021). "Proclamation on the Termination Of Emergency With Respect To The Southern Border Of The United States And Redirection Of Funds Diverted To Border Wall Construction". The White House. Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved February xi, 2021.
  21. ^ Biden, Joe (February xi, 2021). "A Letter to the Speaker Of The House And President Of The Senate Regarding the Termination of the National Emergency Apropos the Southern Border". The White Business firm. Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved Feb 11, 2021.
  22. ^ Bender, Michael C. (February 15, 2019). "How the Border Wall, Trump's Signature Campaign Promise, Turned Into a National Emergency". Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on February 16, 2019. Retrieved February 17, 2019.
  23. ^ Pramuk, Jacob (January 25, 2019). "Trump signs bill to reopen government and end shutdown". Cnbc.com. Archived from the original on Jan 26, 2019. Retrieved January 26, 2019.
  24. ^ Gates, Guilbert (January nine, 2019). "This Government Shutdown Is One of the Longest Ever". The New York Times. Archived from the original on Jan 9, 2019. Retrieved Jan 10, 2019.
  25. ^ Koti, Karhu (Jan 26, 2019). "United states Authorities Shutdown Timer". Karhukoti.com. Archived from the original on January 26, 2019. Retrieved January 26, 2019.
  26. ^ Ari Natter (February 17, 2019). "Regime Contractors to Lose Out on Shutdown Pay, Dragging Downwards Economic system". Bloomberg.com. Archived from the original on February 21, 2019. Retrieved February 25, 2019.
  27. ^ "Shutdown cost U.S. economy $11 billion, budget function says". NBC News. Archived from the original on February 20, 2019. Retrieved February 15, 2021.
  28. ^ Julie Hirschfeld Davis & Michael Tackett (January two, 2019). "Trump and Democrats Dig In Subsequently Talks to Reopen Government Go Nowhere". The New York Times. Archived from the original on January 3, 2019. Retrieved January three, 2019.
  29. ^ Damian Paletta & Erica Werner (January 2, 2019). "Trump falsely claims United mexican states is paying for wall, demands taxpayer coin for wall in meeting with Democrats". The Washington Mail service. Archived from the original on Jan 3, 2019. Retrieved January 3, 2019.
  30. ^ Liptak, Kevin (January 4, 2019). "Trump says he could keep shutdown going for months or years". CNN. Archived from the original on January four, 2019. Retrieved January 4, 2019.
  31. ^ Clare, Foran; Barrett, Ted (December 20, 2018). "Senate passes cease-gap funding neb in effort to avert government shutdown". CNN. Washington, DC. Archived from the original on February 14, 2019. Retrieved Feb 17, 2019. The adjacent step for the end-gap funding effort is the House of Representatives where information technology is likely to laissez passer despite some conservative opposition.
  32. ^ Pramuk, Jacob (December 20, 2018). "Paul Ryan: Trump won't sign Senate neb to avoid government shutdown". CNBC. Archived from the original on February xviii, 2019. Retrieved Feb 17, 2019.
  33. ^ "Vast Majority of Americans Frustrated, Embarrassed by the Shutdown, Support Dorsum Pay for Federal Workers". Ipsos. Archived from the original on February 21, 2019. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
  34. ^ Wagner, John; Dawsey, Josh; Paletta, Damian (Feb 15, 2019). "Shutdown averted: President Trump has signed a sweeping spending pecker hours before funding expired for parts of the government". Washington Post. Archived from the original on February 15, 2019. Retrieved February xv, 2019.
  35. ^ Fritze, John; Collins, Michael (February 16, 2019). "'I didn't demand to do this.' Critics say Trump quote undercuts national emergency for edge wall". U.s.a. Today. Archived from the original on Feb 17, 2019. Retrieved February 17, 2019.
  36. ^ Baker, Peter (February 15, 2019). "Trump Declares a National Emergency, and Provokes a Constitutional Disharmonism". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February xvi, 2019. Retrieved February 17, 2019.
  37. ^ Forgey, Quint (February xvi, 2019). "'I didn't need to do this': Dems pounce on Trump's national emergency access". Politician. Archived from the original on February 16, 2019. Retrieved February 17, 2019.
  38. ^ Blake, Aaron (February 15, 2019). "Analysis | 'I didn't need to do this': Trump just kneecapped his own case for a 'national emergency'". Washington Post. Archived from the original on Feb 17, 2019. Retrieved February 17, 2019.
  39. ^ Baker, Peter (February 15, 2019). "Trump Declares a National Emergency, and Provokes a Constitutional Clash". The New York Times. Archived from the original on Feb 16, 2019. Retrieved February 16, 2019. The emergency declaration, co-ordinate to White House officials, enables the president to divert $iii.6 billion from military construction projects to the wall. Mr. Trump will besides apply more traditional presidential discretion to tap $2.5 billion from counternarcotics programs and $600 million from a Treasury Section asset forfeiture fund.
  40. ^ Seligman, Lara. "Trump Declares National Emergency in 'Slap in the Confront to Military Families'". Strange Policy. Archived from the original on February fifteen, 2019. Retrieved February 15, 2019.
  41. ^ Lu, Denise (February 15, 2019). "Trump's Emergency Declaration is the Starting time Since ix/11 to Authorize Military Activeness". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February xvi, 2019. Retrieved February 16, 2019.
  42. ^ Donnelly, John M. (February 21, 2019). "Congress could block big chunk of Trump'southward emergency wall money". Roll Call. Archived from the original on February 22, 2019. Retrieved Feb 22, 2019. That includes $iii.vi billion from unspent armed services structure money, $2.5 billion in unspent Pentagon counterdrug funds and $600 million from a Treasury Department asset forfeiture account. But the Defense Department has told lawmakers that simply $85 1000000 remains unspent in the counterdrug account, a House Appropriations spokesman said Thursday.
  43. ^ "Third of coin Trump plans to use to build wall has already been spent". The Independent. February 22, 2019. Archived from the original on February 22, 2019. Retrieved February 22, 2019.
  44. ^ Graves, Brad (March nineteen, 2019). "Some Military Structure May Look for Edge Wall". San Diego Business Journal. Archived from the original on March 20, 2019. Retrieved March 20, 2019.
  45. ^ Wagner, John; Werner, Erica (March 26, 2019). "Pentagon announces $1-billion transfer for border barriers, as Democrats object". Los Angeles Times. Archived from the original on March 27, 2019. Retrieved March 27, 2019.
  46. ^ a b Salary, Jr., Perry (Feb eighteen, 2019). "Could Congress Block Trump'southward Emergency Annunciation?". Fivethirtyeight.com. Archived from the original on Feb 18, 2019. Retrieved February fifteen, 2021.
  47. ^ Caygle, Heather; Ferris, Sarah. "Pelosi: House moving 'swiftly' to block Trump's emergency annunciation". Political leader. Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved Feb 21, 2019.
  48. ^ "H.J.Res.46 - Relating to a national emergency declared by the President on February 15, 2019". Congress.gov. Archived from the original on March 13, 2019. Retrieved March fifteen, 2019.
  49. ^ "The Latest: House blocks Trump's emergency proclamation". Washington Post. Archived from the original on February 27, 2019. Retrieved March 3, 2019.
  50. ^ Everett, Burgess. "Rand Paul to oppose Trump on national emergency". Politico. Archived from the original on February fifteen, 2021. Retrieved March iii, 2019.
  51. ^ Wise, Justin (March 4, 2019). "Rand Paul says 'at least' x GOP senators are set to vote against Trump'due south emergency declaration". The Colina. Archived from the original on March v, 2019. Retrieved March 5, 2019.
  52. ^ Cochrane, Emily; Thrush, Glenn (March xiv, 2019). "Senate Rejects Trump's Edge Emergency Declaration, Setting Up Offset Veto". The New York Times. Archived from the original on March 14, 2019. Retrieved March 14, 2019.
  53. ^ Caroline Kelly & Phil Mattingly, These 12 GOP senators voted against Trump'due south national emergency declaration Archived March 14, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, CNN (March xiv, 2019).
  54. ^ Roll Call Vote No. 49: On the Joint Resolution (H.J. Res. 46) Archived August i, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, Secretary of the Senate, 116th Congress, 1st Session (March 14, 2019).
  55. ^ "Trump issues kickoff veto of his presidency, says resolution 'put countless Americans in danger'". CNN. March xv, 2019. Archived from the original on March 15, 2019. Retrieved March 15, 2019.
  56. ^ "Veto Bulletin to the House of Representatives for H.J. Res. 46". whitehouse.gov. Archived from the original on January 20, 2021. Retrieved March 15, 2019 – via National Archives.
  57. ^ @SpeakerPelosi (March 15, 2019). "On March 26, the House will again act to protect our Constitution and our democracy from the President's emergency declaration by property a vote to override his veto" (Tweet) – via Twitter.
  58. ^ Montoya-Galvez, Camilo (March 26, 2019). "Attempt to override Trump veto on national emergency resolution fails in House". CBS News. Archived from the original on March 26, 2019. Retrieved March 26, 2019.
  59. ^ "FINAL VOTE RESULTS FOR ROLL CALL 127". United States Business firm Clerk. March 26, 2019. Archived from the original on March 26, 2019. Retrieved March 26, 2019.
  60. ^ Carney, Jordain (October 17, 2019). "Senate fails to override Trump veto over emergency proclamation". The Loma. Archived from the original on October 17, 2019. Retrieved October 17, 2019.
  61. ^ Baker, Peter (Feb 15, 2019). "Trump Declares a National Emergency, and Provokes a Constitutional Clash". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on February xvi, 2019. Retrieved Feb 16, 2019.
  62. ^ a b c Romero, Simon (February 15, 2019). "Trump Declared a Border Emergency. Here's How It Could Be Undone in Courtroom". The New York Times. Archived from the original on Feb xvi, 2019. Retrieved February sixteen, 2019.
  63. ^ "El Paso County & Edge Network for Man Rights v. President Trump, et al. – Complaint". Protect Democracy. Archived from the original on Feb 22, 2019. Retrieved February 21, 2019.
  64. ^ Maria, Cortés Gonzáles (February 15, 2019). "El Paso County community leaders denote lawsuit against state of emergency proclamation". El Paso Times . Retrieved February 16, 2019.
  65. ^ Moore, Robert; Tyx, Daniel (February fifteen, 2019). "Border communities brainstorm legal challenges to Trump'due south emergency declaration, wall construction". Washington Post. El Paso. Archived from the original on Feb 16, 2019. Retrieved February xvi, 2019.
  66. ^ a b c Gomez, Alan; Hayes, Christal (Feb 15, 2019). "First lawsuits filed against Trump'due south national emergency order". U.s. Today. Archived from the original on February 16, 2019. Retrieved February xvi, 2019. A avalanche of organizations and officials have already pledged to fight this in court.
  67. ^ Axelrod, Tal (February 15, 2019). "Starting time lawsuit filed against Trump emergency proclamation". TheHill. Archived from the original on February 16, 2019. Retrieved February 16, 2019.
  68. ^ Savage, Charlie; Pear, Robert (February xviii, 2019). "16 States Sue to Finish Trump'south Use of Emergency Powers to Build Border Wall". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 19, 2019. Retrieved February xix, 2019.
  69. ^ Reuters (February 19, 2019). "16 US states sue over Trump border wall emergency proclamation". The Guardian. Archived from the original on Feb 19, 2019. Retrieved February 19, 2019.
  70. ^ "Us states sue Trump over border wall". BBC News. February nineteen, 2019. Archived from the original on February nineteen, 2019. Retrieved Feb 19, 2019.
  71. ^ Gonzales, Richard (December eleven, 2019). "second Federal Gauge Blocks Plan To Use Pentagon Funds For Edge Wall". NPR. Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved June 26, 2020.
  72. ^ Clark, Dartunorro. "ACLU sues Trump over his national emergency for border wall". NBC News. Archived from the original on Feb xx, 2019. Retrieved Feb 20, 2019.
  73. ^ Frazin, Rachel (Feb 15, 2019). "ACLU announces lawsuit against Trump over 'blatantly illegal' national emergency". The Colina. Archived from the original on February 15, 2019. Retrieved February 16, 2019.
  74. ^ Kendall, Brent; Radnofsky, Louise (May 25, 2019). "Federal Estimate Blocks Trump'southward Border-Wall Plans". Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on May 25, 2019. Retrieved June 5, 2019.
  75. ^ Maura Dolan, Trump may not utilize armed services money for edge wall, federal appeals court decides Archived July 8, 2019, at the Wayback Motorcar, Los Angeles Times (July 3, 2019).
  76. ^ Liptak, Adam (July 26, 2019). "Supreme Court Lets Trump Proceed on Wall Plans Amid Legal Fight". Archived from the original on July 26, 2019. Retrieved July 26, 2019 – via NYTimes.com.
  77. ^ Thomsen, Jacqueline (July 26, 2019). "Supreme Court rules Trump tin can employ military funds for border wall construction". The Loma. Archived from the original on July 26, 2019. Retrieved July 26, 2019.
  78. ^ Gregorian, Dareh (June 26, 2020). "Appeals court rules funding for Trump border wall structure 'unlawful'". NBC News. Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved June 26, 2020.
  79. ^ Petterson, Edvard (June 26, 2020). "Trump's 2019 Border Wall Spending Rebuffed by Appeals Court". Bloomberg News . Retrieved October 19, 2020.
  80. ^ Williams, Pete (October 19, 2020). "Supreme Court to take upward Trump edge wall spending, asylum enforcement". NBC News. Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved October xix, 2020.
  81. ^ Williams, Pete (July 31, 2020). "Supreme Court allows border wall construction to go on". NBC News. Archived from the original on Feb 15, 2021. Retrieved August 19, 2020.
  82. ^ Josh Gerstein, Appeals court lifts cake on $3.6 billion for Trump edge wall plan Archived January 9, 2020, at the Wayback Machine, Politician (January eight, 2020).
  83. ^ Hsu, Spencer Southward. (June 3, 2019). "Approximate rejects House suit to block transfer of billions of dollars for Trump edge wall". The Washington Postal service. Archived from the original on July ane, 2019. Retrieved Feb xv, 2021.
  84. ^ Thomsen, Jacqueline (June 3, 2019). "Judge rejects House Democrats' attempt to cake Trump employ of military funds for edge wall". The Hill. Archived from the original on June v, 2019. Retrieved June 5, 2019.
  85. ^ "Lawsuit Challenges Trump'south Emergency Announcement for Border Wall". Center for Biological Variety. February 16, 2019. Archived from the original on February nineteen, 2019. Retrieved February xix, 2019.
  86. ^ "Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief" (PDF). Center for Biological Diversity. February 16, 2019. Archived (PDF) from the original on Feb 25, 2019. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
  87. ^ a b Klein, Philip (Feb 14, 2019). "Trump declaring a national emergency to build border wall with McConnell'south support will come back to haunt conservatives". Washington Examiner. Archived from the original on February 15, 2019. Retrieved February xv, 2019.
  88. ^ Everett, Burgess; Desiderio, Rew; Zanona, Melanie (February 14, 2019). "Trump shocks GOP with emergency declaration". Pol. Archived from the original on February 15, 2021. Retrieved February xv, 2019.
  89. ^ a b c Woodruff, Judy; Panetta, Leon (February 14, 2019). "Why Trump'southward national emergency plan could present a 'major ramble test'". PBS. Archived from the original on February 15, 2019. Retrieved Feb 15, 2019. Generally, it's a difficult case to make that it constitutes the kind of a national emergency that would exist able to support the president'southward motion here... But, ultimately, the courts will have to decide whether, indeed, the president has this kind of power. Expect, Judy, we're operating nether a Constitution that provides checks and balances. And those checks and balances are aimed at trying to limit the power of the president, the power of the Congress, power of the courts. That'south why our forefathers created it. A president who now uses a national emergency to bypass the will of Congress with regards to funding for a wall is basically rejecting an important check and balance that was congenital into our Constitution.
  90. ^ a b Illing, Sean (Feb fifteen, 2019). "Trump alleged a national emergency at the edge. I asked 11 experts if it's legal". Vocalisation. Archived from the original on February 15, 2019. Retrieved February 15, 2021. I reached out to 11 legal experts and asked them to assess the president'southward prospects. The consensus seems to be that while there is enough ambiguity in the police to permit Trump to declare an emergency, his determination to circumvent Congress and utilize the military to build a wall will very likely lose in court.
  91. ^ a b Witherspoon, Andrew (February xv, 2019). "Why national emergencies are usually declared". Axios. Archived from the original on February xvi, 2019. Retrieved Feb 15, 2021. Most experts concur that Trump'southward use of a national emergency is a legally questionable use of emergency powers.
  92. ^ a b Ackerman, Bruce (January 5, 2019). "Opinion | No, Trump Cannot Declare an 'Emergency' to Build His Wall". The New York Times. ISSN 0362-4331. Archived from the original on Jan 17, 2019. Retrieved February 14, 2019.
  93. ^ Fritze, John (February fifteen, 2019). "National emergencies are common; declaring one for a edge wall is not". United states of america Today. Archived from the original on February fifteen, 2019. Retrieved February 15, 2019. Experts said the idea of using a national emergency to build the president'south promised edge wall would be novel, and both Democrats and outside groups have threatened to sue.
  94. ^ a b "Trump's presidency enters a new imperial phase – and Mitch McConnell just rolls over". The Washington Post. February 14, 2019. Archived from the original on February 15, 2019. Retrieved February 15, 2019.
  95. ^ Dunne, Erin (February fifteen, 2019). "Trump's emergency annunciation stretches the law and violates the separation of powers". The Washington Examiner. Archived from the original on Feb 15, 2019. Retrieved February 15, 2019.
  96. ^ "Trump'due south 'national emergency' programme reveals real crisis in America". The Houston Chronicle. February 14, 2019. Archived from the original on Feb xv, 2019. Retrieved February 15, 2019.
  97. ^ Allen, Jonathan (February 15, 2019). "Trump'south declaring a national emergency to get his wall. He's forcing a ramble crisis". NBC News. Archived from the original on February 15, 2019. Retrieved February 15, 2019.
  98. ^ McBain, Sophie. "After a political crisis, Trump'southward national emergency programme creates a constitutional one". New Statesman. Archived from the original on February 15, 2019. Retrieved February 15, 2019.
  99. ^ Stieb, Matt (February 15, 2019). "Everything You Need to Know Nearly Trump's National Emergency Plan". New York Mag. Archived from the original on February fifteen, 2019. Retrieved February 15, 2019.
  100. ^ McCarthy, Tom (February 15, 2019). "National emergency: Trump's 'clear abuse of power' faces torrent of lawsuits". The Guardian. Archived from the original on February xv, 2019. Retrieved February 15, 2019.
  101. ^ "Democracy for All? V-Dem Almanac Democracy Report 2018" (PDF). Varieties of Democracy. May 28, 2018. pp. 5–vi, 16, 19–22, 27–32, 36, 46, 48, 54, and 56. Archived (PDF) from the original on Jan 17, 2019. Retrieved Feb 15, 2019.
  102. ^ "Moving ridge 7 Report – Oct/November 2018". Brilliant Line Spotter. Nov 15, 2018. Archived from the original on February 15, 2019. Retrieved February 15, 2019.
  103. ^ "Democracy in Retreat: Freedom in the World 2019". Freedom House. Archived from the original on February xv, 2019. Retrieved Feb xv, 2019. At the midpoint of his term, even so, there remains petty question that President Trump exerts an influence on American politics that is straining our core values and testing the stability of our ramble system. No president in living memory has shown less respect for its tenets, norms, and principles. Trump has assailed essential institutions and traditions including the separation of powers, a free press, an independent judiciary, the impartial commitment of justice, safeguards confronting corruption, and most disturbingly, the legitimacy of elections. Congress, a coequal branch of government, has too frequently failed to push back against these attacks with meaningful oversight and other defenses.
  104. ^ de los Santos, Senerey (February 18, 2019). "Hundreds bear witness up for 'fake national emergency' protestation in Ventura". KEYT. Archived from the original on Feb 19, 2019. Retrieved February 20, 2019.
  105. ^ Prosser, Maggie; Ludlow, Randy (February eighteen, 2019). "Protesters call Trump wall emergency a 'imitation'". The Columbus Dispatch. Archived from the original on February 20, 2019. Retrieved February xx, 2019.
  106. ^ "Nationwide Protests Against Trump's 'Emergency'". Courthouse News Service. Associated Press. Feb 19, 2019. Archived from the original on Feb nineteen, 2019. Retrieved February xx, 2019.
  107. ^ Cochrane, Emily (Feb 25, 2019). "Former Lawmakers Pressure Congress to Reject Trump's Emergency Declaration". Archived from the original on Feb 26, 2019. Retrieved February 25, 2019 – via NYTimes.com.
  108. ^ a b Hulse, Carl; Thrush, Glenn (Feb 16, 2019). "Trump'southward Attempt to Circumvent Congress Leaves Uneasy Senate Republicans With Hard Choice". Nytimes.com. Archived from the original on February 16, 2019. Retrieved February xvi, 2019.
  109. ^ Harry Enten. "Donald Trump is well positioned to fend off a primary challenge in 2020". CNN.com. Archived from the original on Feb nineteen, 2019. Retrieved February 18, 2019.
  110. ^ a b c d Hulse, Carl; Thrush, Glenn (February 16, 2019). "Trump's Endeavor to Circumvent Congress Leaves Uneasy Senate Republicans With Hard Choice". The New York Times. Archived from the original on February 16, 2019. Retrieved February 16, 2019.
  111. ^ "A Funded Government". News Center – U.Due south. Senator Johnny Isakson. February xv, 2019. Archived from the original on February 16, 2019. Retrieved Feb xvi, 2019.
  112. ^ a b Allen, Emily. "Reaction to emergency split on party, state lines". 1000 Forks Herald. Archived from the original on February 17, 2019. Retrieved February 17, 2019.
  113. ^ Segers, Grace (Feb xv, 2019). "Republicans respond to Trump'due south national emergency proclamation". CBS News. Archived from the original on February xvi, 2019. Retrieved February sixteen, 2019.
  114. ^ Haddad, Ken (February fifteen, 2019). "Michigan GOP Congressman: Trump 'circumventing constitutional arrangement' with emergency declaration". ClickOnDetroit.com. Graham Media Group. Archived from the original on February 15, 2019. Retrieved February 16, 2019.
  115. ^ Samuels, Brett. "GOP rep: Trump emergency declaration puts US in 'uncharted territory'". The Hill. Archived from the original on Feb 18, 2019. Retrieved Feb 19, 2019.
  116. ^ "Transcript: Rep. Will Hurd on "Face the Nation," February 17, 2019". CBS News. Archived from the original on February nineteen, 2019. Retrieved February 19, 2019.
  117. ^ Schwartz, Ian (February xiv, 2019). "Pelosi: Democratic President Will Now Be Able To Declare National Emergency On Guns". RealClearPolitics. RealClearHoldings, LLC. Archived from the original on Feb xv, 2019. Retrieved February 15, 2019.
  118. ^ Pramuk, Jacob (Feb 15, 2019). "Pelosi and Schumer criticize Trump national emergency proclamation". world wide web.cnbc.com. CNBC LLC. CNBC. Archived from the original on Feb 15, 2019. Retrieved Feb 15, 2019.
  119. ^ Wagner, John; Dawsey, Josh; Paletta, Damian. "Trump's border emergency: Democrats criticize proclamation, vow action". Washington Post. Archived from the original on Feb 15, 2019. Retrieved Feb fifteen, 2019.
  120. ^ "Pelosi, Schumer blast Trump's emergency announcement". The Boston Globe. AP News. February 15, 2019. Archived from the original on February 15, 2019. Retrieved Feb xv, 2019.
    "The Latest: Pelosi, Schumer rip Trump emergency proclamation". AP News. Feb 15, 2019. Archived from the original on Feb 15, 2019. Retrieved February 15, 2019.
  121. ^ Charns, David (February fifteen, 2019). "Collins, Maine'south entire congressional delegation, criticize national emergency plan". WMTW News 8 Portland. Archived from the original on February 17, 2019. Retrieved February 17, 2019.
  122. ^ Sneed, Tierney (February 15, 2019). "House Dems Open Probe Into Trump Border Move, With Hearing In 'Coming Days'". Talking Points Memo. Archived from the original on February 16, 2019. Retrieved February sixteen, 2019.
  123. ^ Cohen, Michael A. (February 15, 2019). "President Trump's national emergency threatens democracy". Boston Globe. Archived from the original on February 19, 2019. Retrieved February 18, 2019.
  124. ^ Truax, Chris (February 17, 2019). "Donald Trump'south emergency declaration is an set on on democracy". United states Today. Archived from the original on February xix, 2019. Retrieved February eighteen, 2019.
  125. ^ Boot, Max (February xv, 2019). "Trump'south 'emergency' is his latest set on on the norms of American democracy". The Washington Post. Archived from the original on Feb 19, 2019. Retrieved February 18, 2019.
  126. ^ "Republicans fear the next Autonomous president could declare an emergency over climate modify or guns". Theweek.com. January 11, 2019. Archived from the original on February 17, 2019. Retrieved February 16, 2019.
  127. ^ "What are people maxim about Trump's national emergency?". BBC News. February 17, 2019. Archived from the original on February 17, 2019. Retrieved February xix, 2019.
  128. ^ Concha, Joe (Feb 15, 2019). "Coulter fires dorsum at Trump: 'Simply national emergency is that our president is an idiot'". The Hill. Archived from the original on February 20, 2019. Retrieved February xix, 2019.
  129. ^ Smith, Allan (Feb 17, 2019). "Trump'due south border declaration facing legal challenges; experts counterbalance in". NBC News. Archived from the original on February 17, 2019. Retrieved Feb 18, 2019.
  130. ^ Axelrod, Tal (February 16, 2019). "Hewitt: Trump could win legal challenge over emergency declaration". The Hill. Archived from the original on February 17, 2019. Retrieved February 18, 2019.
  131. ^ Thomson-DeVeaux, Amelia (Feb 15, 2019). "Does Trump'due south National Emergency Set A Problematic Precedent For Conservatives?". FiveThirtyEight. Archived from the original on February xvi, 2019. Retrieved February xvi, 2019. Republicans' endorsement of a potentially dramatic expansion of executive power. There is a potential case to be made that Trump's action, regardless of what it means for the hereafter, violates bones principles of limited-authorities conservatism, which is mostly opposed to executive overreach and supportive of a strong separation of powers.
  132. ^ a b c d Moon, Emily. "Trump Declared a National Emergency Over the Border Wall. What Will Happen Now?". Pacific Standard. Archived from the original on February 23, 2019. Retrieved Feb 22, 2019.
  133. ^ Paletta, Damian; Wagner, John; Mike, DeBonis. "Trump declares national emergency on southern edge in bid to build wall". Washington Mail service. Archived from the original on February 15, 2019. Retrieved Feb 22, 2019.
  134. ^ "Butterfly Center, Chapel Spared in Bill Funding New Border Barrier in Rio Grande Valley". Rivard Report. February 14, 2019. Archived from the original on Apr 27, 2019. Retrieved Apr 27, 2019.
  135. ^ "Conference Study [To accompany H.J. Res. 31]" (PDF). U.S. House of Representatives. Archived (PDF) from the original on March eight, 2019. Retrieved April 27, 2019.
  136. ^ "Documents: Border wall could bear upon fifteen percent of Rio Grande refuge". Herald-Mail Media. Apr 1, 2019. Archived from the original on Apr 27, 2019. Retrieved April 27, 2019.
  137. ^ "A cowboy priest battles to protect 153-yr-old Texas chapel from a border fence". Fifty.A. Times. Jan thirty, 2019. Archived from the original on Jan 31, 2019. Retrieved February 1, 2019.
  138. ^ "Georgetown Law helps Texas diocese fight border wall". Crux. Jan 30, 2019. Archived from the original on January 31, 2019. Retrieved February 1, 2019.
  139. ^ "Procession shows back up for Texas chapel at heart of border wall plan". Crux. Catholic News Service. April eighteen, 2019. Archived from the original on Apr 27, 2019. Retrieved April 27, 2019.
  140. ^ Perry Bacon Jr., Trump's National Emergency Policy Is Unpopular, But Not Actually Unpopular Archived July 1, 2019, at the Wayback Motorcar, FiveThirtyEight (February 22, 2019).
  141. ^ Domenico Montanaro, Poll: vi-In-10 Disapprove of Trump's Declaration of a National Emergency Archived July 1, 2019, at the Wayback Machine, NPR.

External links [edit]

  • Presidential Annunciation on Declaring a National Emergency Concerning the Southern Edge of the United states from whitehouse.gov
  • Proclamation 9844 in the Federal Register

greenbied1969.blogspot.com

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Emergency_Concerning_the_Southern_Border_of_the_United_States

Publicar un comentario for "Trump Is Again Considering Invoking Emergency Powers to Build Border Wall"